Indigenous peoples have the right to the possession of lands traditionally occupied by them regardless of prior demarcation.

It is unlawful and illegitimate to distinguish between indigenous peoples residing in traditional territory and those living outside of it in the provision of healthcare services by public authorities.

The Judiciary Branch may set a deadline for the Executive Branch to adopt measures necessary for the demarcation of indigenous land when there is unjustifiable government inaction. 

In the adoption of indigenous children, in which members of their own community or ethnicity have priority, the best interest of the child can take precedence over the protection of their social and cultural identity.

State liability for environmental damage is joint and several in the event of omission in the duty of control and supervision.

Although environmental obligations run with the land, it is possible to require them not only from the current owner or possessor, but also from any of the previous ones. Only the transferor whose real right has ceased prior to the occurrence of the damage, provided that it has not contributed, directly or indirectly, is exempt from liability.

Fait accompli can not be applied to environmental law.

There is no limitation period for claims regarding compensation for environmental damage.

The State can be held liable for environmental damage when it fails to use all coercive means legally available to prevent the invasion of public property.

It is possible to dismiss formalities in an adoption lawsuit if the long-standing factual circumstances safeguard the best interest of the child.